without having some idea as to what it may cost if one
        
        
          decides to move forward. What is being proposed is that one
        
        
          needs to spend the majority of one’s time focusing on the
        
        
          benefits, and value that the software can deliver before taking
        
        
          the ‘deep dive’ into determining the final cost of
        
        
          implementation and final ROI. It is better to look at total cost
        
        
          in light of what one will get for the outlay instead of looking
        
        
          at what you can get for a certain spend.
        
        
          
            Surviving the demo
          
        
        
          It is not a mistake that the subject of the software/solution
        
        
          demo has been left to the end of this piece, and that is
        
        
          because that is where it belongs. Often when a software
        
        
          solution is being looked at one of the first things that is
        
        
          requested is a demo, and often based on the ‘performance’ of
        
        
          the person doing the demo most of the buying decisions are
        
        
          made. This is not the best approach.
        
        
          In basing a decision on what is known in the industry as a
        
        
          ‘dog and pony show’ i.e. a circus act, is not the best basis for
        
        
          the selection of a software solution, and especially something
        
        
          as complicated and enterprise impacting as a plant design and
        
        
          engineering solution. Please do not misunderstand, a client
        
        
          will need a demo and it should not only be thorough, but it
        
        
          should help answer questions as to ‘Can it deliver?’ That
        
        
          means that having someone demonstrate the solution until
        
        
          one sees something that one likes, or even dislikes, is not
        
        
          productive. A solution may be rejected because the
        
        
          demonstrator was just not on that day. The author has been
        
        
          that demonstrator, and is certain because of that misstep the
        
        
          prospect in that case ended up with the wrong solutions.
        
        
          The better way to use the demo is to have the software
        
        
          company demonstrate that they can do all that has been
        
        
          agreed can be done. In some cases, with more complicated
        
        
          solutions, which may need customisation, have them
        
        
          demonstrate how what is needed can be arrived at, and how
        
        
          that will be done.
        
        
          Remember, eyes on the prize, the idea is for them to
        
        
          demonstrate the capability of the software to do what is
        
        
          needed, not to catch them out, or for them to provide
        
        
          entertainment.
        
        
          
            Conclusion
          
        
        
          There is a lot of good software out there, created by teams of
        
        
          dedicated individuals that passionately care about what they
        
        
          are doing and how they will effect the lives of those that put
        
        
          their trust in what they are creating. Take the time to evaluate
        
        
          as many vendors as possible and also take the opportunity to
        
        
          find out what others are doing and why they have made the
        
        
          decision to select one vendor’s offering over another. The
        
        
          reading of success stories can be particularly enlightening as
        
        
          they can often offer insight into an end users situation, the
        
        
          problems that they faced, how they solved those problems
        
        
          and what their pay off, or value was from deploying a solution.
        
        
          All the above may seem complicated compared to
        
        
          someone coming in and doing a demo, but if the steps above
        
        
          are followed, one will be more assured of success than if more
        
        
          ‘traditional’ ways of selecting a solution were used. One will
        
        
          know what one wants the software to do and will be less
        
        
          surprised when it does not perform as slickly as when ‘that guy
        
        
          did the demo.’
        
        
          
            Global leader in development, engineering and testing.
          
        
        
          
            Superior Reliability.
          
        
        
          
            Full Range of Cryogenic Pumps.
          
        
        
          •  In tank, removable pumps for storage tanks.
        
        
          • Vessel-mounted pumps for process systems.
        
        
          • Fixed mounted pumps for marine or other applications.
        
        
          
            Low total cost of ownership.
          
        
        
          
            No shaft seals - maximize safety, with low maintenance costs.
          
        
        
          
            Unparalleled quality.
          
        
        
          
            Exceptional pump-down capability (low NPSHR).
          
        
        
          • Global Headquarters with production and test facilities located in Las Vegas, USA
        
        
          • Production & Test Facilities in Las Vegas, USA and Tokyo, Japan
        
        
          • NCI is served by the Nikkiso and LEWA Worldwide network
        
        
          • Over 1700 units operating in 618 facilities worldwide onshore & offshore
        
        
          • Pumps for LNG/NGL/LN2/LEG up to 3000 m3/h of flow and up to 3000m of head
        
        
          • Up to 25,000 hours Manufacturers Warrantee Over 25 years of Engineering Excellence
        
        
          OVEr
        
        
          
            25 yEaRS
          
        
        
          OF ENGINEErING
        
        
          
            ExCELLENCE
          
        
        
          
            SUBMERGED MOTOR CRyOGENIC
          
        
        
          
            PUMPS FOR LIQUIFIED GaSES